ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: According to the results of the ESSE-RF study, the frequency of obesity in the population reached 29.7%. Obesity is one of the main risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases. Features of the course of COVID-19 in patients with obesity is a very urgent problem. AIM: The aim of the study was a comparative investigation of clinical and laboratory-instrumental parameters in AH patients with or without obesity who had COVID-19 associated pneumonia, to identify the role of obesity as a potential predictor of post-COVID cardiovascular complications 3 months after discharge from the hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials and methods. The study included 174 patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Group 1 included 78 patients with AH without obesity, group 2 - 96 patients with AH and obesity. All patients were tested with a blood sample at the time of admission and 3 months after discharge from the hospital. We assessed parameters of general blood test, biochemistry, hemostasis, inflammation biomarkers - concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP), highly sensitive CRP (hs-CRP), homocysteine, IL-6, etc. All patients initially underwent computed tomography of the chest. In both groups, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring was performed using BPLaB device, according to the standard protocol;echocardiography using an expert class ultrasound diagnostic system Vivid S70. The study is registered with the Clinical Trials.gov database Identifier: NCT04501822. RESULT(S): Results. The biomarker that significantly distinguished the both groups of patients, as well as subgroups according to the degree of obesity was the concentration of maxCRP and hs-CRP, which was significantly higher in group 2. In addition, the registered maximum values of MPO, NT-proBNP, IL-1,6, TNA-alpha and NRL parameters in group 2 of patients with 2-3 degrees of obesity, may indicate the highest probability of developing delayed adverse cardiovascular complications in this group of patients. Mean systolic blood pressure, variability of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate at night were significantly higher in AH patients with obesity. Numerous correlations of obesity with laboratory and instrumental parameters have been registered, which may indicate an increased likelihood of delayed unwanted cardiovascular complications in this particular group of patients. Multiple regression showed that obesity is an independent predictor of an increase in LDH, hs-CRP and right atrium. CONCLUSION(S): Dynamic control of the studied parameters in patients with AH and OB registered an increased concentration of CRP at the initial stage and 3 months after treatment, with a general trend towards a decrease in the increased initial structural parameters of ECHO CG. The logistic regression method showed that the presence of OB in patients with AH is an independent factor causing increased levels of immune inflammation (CRP), a marker of tissue destruction (LDH), and load on the right atrium.Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: According to the results of the ESSE-RF study, the frequency of obesity in the population reached 29.7%. Obesity is one of the main risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases. Features of the course of COVID-19 in patients with obesity is a very urgent problem. AIM: The aim of the study was a comparative investigation of clinical and laboratory-instrumental parameters in AH patients with or without obesity who had COVID-19 associated pneumonia, to identify the role of obesity as a potential predictor of post-COVID cardiovascular complications 3 months after discharge from the hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials and methods. The study included 174 patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Group 1 included 78 patients with AH without obesity, group 2 - 96 patients with AH and obesity. All patients were tested with a blood sample at the time of admission and 3 months after discharge from the hospital. We assessed parameters of general blood test, biochemistry, hemostasis, inflammation biomarkers - concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP), highly sensitive CRP (hs-CRP), homocysteine, IL-6, etc. All patients initially underwent computed tomography of the chest. In both groups, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring was performed using BPLaB device, according to the standard protocol;echocardiography using an expert class ultrasound diagnostic system Vivid S70. The study is registered with the Clinical Trials.gov database Identifier: NCT04501822. RESULT(S): Results. The biomarker that significantly distinguished the both groups of patients, as well as subgroups according to the degree of obesity was the concentration of maxCRP and hs-CRP, which was significantly higher in group 2. In addition, the registered maximum values of MPO, NT-proBNP, IL-1,6, TNA-alpha and NRL parameters in group 2 of patients with 2-3 degrees of obesity, may indicate the highest probability of developing delayed adverse cardiovascular complications in this group of patients. Mean systolic blood pressure, variability of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate at night were significantly higher in AH patients with obesity. Numerous correlations of obesity with laboratory and instrumental parameters have been registered, which may indicate an increased likelihood of delayed unwanted cardiovascular complications in this particular group of patients. Multiple regression showed that obesity is an independent predictor of an increase in LDH, hs-CRP and right atrium. CONCLUSION(S): Dynamic control of the studied parameters in patients with AH and OB registered an increased concentration of CRP at the initial stage and 3 months after treatment, with a general trend towards a decrease in the increased initial structural parameters of ECHO CG. The logistic regression method showed that the presence of OB in patients with AH is an independent factor causing increased levels of immune inflammation (CRP), a marker of tissue destruction (LDH), and load on the right atrium.Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: According to the results of the ESSE-RF study, the frequency of obesity in the population reached 29.7%. Obesity is one of the main risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases. Features of the course of COVID-19 in patients with obesity is a very urgent problem. AIM: The aim of the study was a comparative investigation of clinical and laboratory-instrumental parameters in AH patients with or without obesity who had COVID-19 associated pneumonia, to identify the role of obesity as a potential predictor of post-COVID cardiovascular complications 3 months after discharge from the hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials and methods. The study included 174 patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia. Group 1 included 78 patients with AH without obesity, group 2 - 96 patients with AH and obesity. All patients were tested with a blood sample at the time of admission and 3 months after discharge from the hospital. We assessed parameters of general blood test, biochemistry, hemostasis, inflammation biomarkers - concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP), highly sensitive CRP (hs-CRP), homocysteine, IL-6, etc. All patients initially underwent computed tomography of the chest. In both groups, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring was performed using BPLaB device, according to the standard protocol;echocardiography using an expert class ultrasound diagnostic system Vivid S70. The study is registered with the Clinical Trials.gov database Identifier: NCT04501822. RESULT(S): Results. The biomarker that significantly distinguished the both groups of patients, as well as subgroups according to the degree of obesity was the concentration of maxCRP and hs-CRP, which was significantly higher in group 2. In addition, the registered maximum values of MPO, NT-proBNP, IL-1,6, TNA-alpha and NRL parameters in group 2 of patients with 2-3 degrees of obesity, may indicate the highest probability of developing delayed adverse cardiovascular complications in this group of patients. Mean systolic blood pressure, variability of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate at night were significantly higher in AH patients with obesity. Numerous correlations of obesity with laboratory and instrumental parameters have been registered, which may indicate an increased likelihood of delayed unwanted cardiovascular complications in this particular group of patients. Multiple regression showed that obesity is an independent predictor of an increase in LDH, hs-CRP and right atrium. CONCLUSION(S): Dynamic control of the studied parameters in patients with AH and OB registered an increased concentration of CRP at the initial stage and 3 months after treatment, with a general trend towards a decrease in the increased initial structural parameters of ECHO CG. The logistic regression method showed that the presence of OB in patients with AH is an independent factor causing increased levels of immune inflammation (CRP), a marker of tissue destruction (LDH), and load on the right atrium.Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: As the number of COVID-19 cases begin to diminish it is important to turn our attention to any long-term issues that may be associated with a prior infection. Cardiovascular defects have been noted following prior SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, less is known about how a previous infection alters the cardiovascular response to exercise. Further, differences may exist during exercise between previously SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals who had symptoms (symptomatic) relative to those who did not have symptoms (asymptomatic). We hypothesized that previously symptomatic (S) COVID-19 recoveries have an altered cardiovascular response to acute exercise relative to both control (CON; never infected), and previously COVID-19 positive asymptomatic (AS) individuals. Methods: Twenty-seven subjects (CON = 9; AS = 9; S = 9) underwent 30 min of submaximal treadmill exercise. During exercise, blood pressure was recorded on the brachial artery every 5 min and 3-lead electrocardiography was measured continuously. Indirect indicators of autonomic nervous system health: heart rate variability and blood pressure variability were measured during each session. Baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) was taken prior to exercise in seated, standing and supine positions. Results: Blood pressure was similar (p > 0.05) amongst all three groups. There were no differences between average heart rate (HR; CON = 104 ± 4 BPM vs AS = 118 ± 6 BPM vs. S = 112 ± 3 BPM), mean arterial pressure (MAP; CON = 108 ± 4 mmHg vs. AS = 105 ± 13 mmHg vs. S = 108 ± 7 mmHg) or oxygen consumption (VO2) between groups during a bout of exercise. However, the standard deviation of the inter beat intervals of normal sinus beats, a measure of heart rate variability (HRV) (CON = 138 ± 2.8 m vs. AS = 156 ± 6 m vs. S = 77.7 ± 11 m; p < 0.05) and blood pressure variability (BPV; CON = 5.18 ± 1.1 vs. AS = 12.1 ± 0.88 mmHg vs. S = 10.2 ± 10.7 mmHg; p < 0.05) were different in our S group. Further, when HRV was assessed in the frequency domain the very low frequency was different during exercise in the S group relative to the other groups. Discussion: Collectively, these data suggest that a previous symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection may alter heart rate and blood pressure regulation during exercise.
ABSTRACT
Objective: There is a scarcity of data on the factors that influence home blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) variability. This study was undertaken to determine the factors that influence home BP and HR fluctuation post COVID infection in the urban Indian population. Designs and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 1000 patients between the ages of 30 and 80 who were previously infected with COVID- 19 infection, but not hospitalized. These patients were guided and trained to measure BP at home. BP and HR readings were taken at home twice a day, in the morning and evening, for seven days (28 measurements). The SD of morning minus evening, and first minus second readings was used to calculate BP and HR variability. Results: Old age, cardiovascular illness, diabetes, and high home blood pressure were all found to be independent predictors of an increased morning than evening home blood pressure variability. Old age, and high home blood pressure were all independent determinants of greater day-to-day home blood pressure variability, while old age, female sex, cardiovascular disease, and high home blood pressure were all independent determinants of greater first versus second home blood pressure variability. Young age, and high home HR, on the other hand, were all independent drivers of increased morning vs evening variability. Young age, female sex, and a high home HR were also independent predictors of first versus second home HR variability. Conclusion: Considering home BP and HR fluctuation have prognostic value, it is critical for clinicians to understand the underlying reasons for these variables. Doctors should focus on alcohol, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease prevention counseling for their high-risk patients. (Table Presented).
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Blood pressure variability (BPV) plays an important role in hypertensive patients, and frequently associated with organ damage. Although hypertension is the most common comorbidity in COVID-19, the impact of BPV and therapeutic target of BPV to outcome in COVID-19 patients with hypertension remain unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between BPV and severity of COVID-19, in-hospital mortality, hypertensive status,, and efficacy of antihypertensives in suppress hypertensive covid-19 patient's BPV. Design and method: This was a cohort retrospective study that enrolled 351 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Subjects were classified according to the presence of hypertension, the severity of COVID-19, and BPV status. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) was measured at 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. during hospitalization, and BPV was calculated as the coefficient of variation of MAP (MAPCV). MAPCV values above the median were defined as high BPV. We compared the hypertensive status, COVID-19 severity, in-hospital mortality and antihypertensive agents between the BPV groups. Results: The mean age was 53.85 ± 18.84 years-old. Subjects with high BPV were significantly associated with hypertension status (PR = 1.38;95%CI = 1.13- 1.70;p = 0.003) or severe COVID-19 (PR = 1.39;95%CI = 1.09-1.76;p = 0.005). In laboratory findings, high BPV group had higher CRP (55.15 ± 50.80 vs 97.79 ± 77.17), higher creatinine cerum (1.80 ± 3.15 vs 0.91 ± 0.14) and high BPV status also significantly increased risk of mortality (HR = 2.30;95%CI = 1.73-3,86;p = <0.001). Patients with combination of severe COVID-19 status, hypertension (+) and high BPV status had the highest risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 3.51;95%CI = 2.32-4,97;p < 0.001) compared to other combination status of groups. In COVID-19 patients with hypertension, combination teraphy with CCB as well as CCB monoteraphy significantly decreased BPV (PR = 0.50;95%CI = 0.27-0.93;p = 0.004) and mortality (HR = 0.17;95%CI = 0.05-0.56;p = 0.004). Conclusions: High BPV was associated with hypertensive status and severe COVID-19, and these factors together increased in-hospital mortality. CCB are antihypertensive agents that were potentially effective in suppressing BPV and mortality in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is essential in hypertensive patients and is frequently associated with organ damage. As of today, hypertension is still the most common comorbidity in COVID-19, but the impact of BPV and the therapeutic target of BPV on outcomes in COVID-19 patients with hypertension remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between BPV and severity of COVID-19, in-hospital mortality, hypertensive status, and efficacy of antihypertensives in suppressing hypertensive covid-19 patient BPV. This cohort retrospective study enrolled 351 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Subjects were classified according to the severity of COVID-19, the presence of hypertension, and their BPV status. During hospitalization, mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured at 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., and BPV was calculated as the coefficient of variation of MAP (MAPCV). MAPCV values above the median were defined as high BPV. In addition, we compared the hypertensive status, COVID-19 severity, in-hospital mortality, and antihypertensive agents between the BPV groups. The mean age was 53.85 ± 18.84 years old. Hypertension was significantly associated with high BPV with prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.38 (95% CI = 1.13-1.70; p = 0.003) or severe COVID-19 (PR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.09-1.76; p = 0.005). In laboratory findings, high BPV group had lower Albumin, higher WBC, serum Cr, CRP, and creatinine to albumin ratio. High BPV status also significantly increased risk of mortality (HR = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.73-3.86; p < 0.001). Patients with a combination of severe COVID-19 status, hypertension, and high BPV status had the highest risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 3.51; 95% CI = 2.32-4.97; p < 0.001) compared to other combination status groups. In COVID-19 patients with hypertension, combination therapy with calcium channel blockers (CCB) as well as CCB monotherapy significantly develop low BPV (PR = 2.002; 95 CI% = 1.33-3.07; p = 0.004) and low mortality (HR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.05-0.56; p = 0.004). Hypertensive status and severe COVID-19 were significantly associated with high BPV, and these factors increased in-hospital mortality. CCBs might be antihypertensive agents that potentially effectively suppressing BPV and mortality in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
In patients who have undergone coronavirus infection, decompensation of the course of chronic cardiovascular diseases, including arterial hypertension, is often observed, which is due to a num-ber of their common pathogenetic mechanisms. To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of controlling arterial hypertension and improving the quality of life who underwent a new coronavirus infection. Totally 62 patients with arterial hypertension who had previously undergone coronavirus infection were examined. The criterion for inclusion in the study was a decrease in blood pressure control on the background of previously effective two-component therapy. Depending on the heart rate at rest, the patients were divided into two groups. In both groups, triple antihypertensive therapy was used as a second step. In the first group-a combination of perindopril 5 mg, indapamide 2.5 mg, amlo-dipine 5 mg. The second group included patients with a heart rate of more than 80 beats per minute, perindopril 5 mg, bisoprolol 5 mg, amlodipine 5 mg. The antihypertensive efficacy of the studied drug combinations was analyzed according to the data of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. During the treatment of arterial hypertension, the dynamics of quality-of-life indicators was analyzed. A study of 24-hour monitoring and blood pressure variability in both groups of patients with coro-navirus infection demonstrated the lack of effective blood pressure control. The use of the analyzed variants of three-component therapy made it possible to achieve the target level of blood pressure in 89.6% and 93.9% of cases, respectively. In both study groups, the achievement of office blood pressure control was accompanied by a statistically significant decrease in all its daily parameters. On the background of antihypertensive therapy in both groups of the study, there was a significant and reliable (p<0.05) increase in all parameters for assessing the quality of life, which reflects the effectiveness of the treatment of arterial hypertension in patients who have had a coronavirus infection in increasing satisfaction with their lives and improving social functioning. Therapy with the use of perindopril, bisoprolol, amlodipine was accompanied by the achievement of significantly (p<0.05) higher rates of mental and physical health components. Copyright © 2022, Yerevan State Medical University. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 45 papers. The topics discussed include: neuropeptide levels effect on blood pressure in chronic kidney disease patients with hypertension;dry weight gain and incidence of intradialytic hypertension: a cross-sectional study in rural hospital;why they don't take the pill: a qualitative study of antihypertensive medication nonadherence in East Borneo primary health care;antihypertensive effect of nigella sativa (Habbatus Sauda) supplementation in population with cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;risk factors of peripheral artery disease in the hypertensive chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis;impact of day-to-day blood pressure variability to in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 and efficacy of antihypertensive agents;and systolic blood pressure as risk factor associated with persisting proteinuria after delivery in women with preeclampsia.
ABSTRACT
Hypertension is the most common comorbidity in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and increases in-hospital mortality. Day-by-day blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is associated with clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, little information is available on the association of BPV with the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. This study aimed to demonstrate whether day-by-day in-hospital BPV had prognostic significance in these patients. The authors included 702 COVID-19 patients with hypertension from Huoshenshan Hospital (Wuhan, China), who underwent valid in-hospital BP measurements on at least seven consecutive days. Day-by-day BPV was assessed by standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and variation independent of mean (VIM). Overall, patients with severe COVID-19 and non-survivors had higher BPV than moderate cases and survivors, respectively. Additionally, higher BPV was correlated with greater age and higher levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, high-sensitive cardiac troponin I, and B-type natriuretic peptide. In multivariable Cox regression, SD of systolic BP (SBP) was predictive of mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.30] as well as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). Similar trends were observed for CV and VIM of SBP, but not indices of diastolic BP variability. The authors demonstrated that day-by-day in-hospital SBP variability can independently predict mortality and ARDS in COVID-19 patients with hypertension. And high BPV might be correlated with severe inflammation and myocardial injury. Further studies are needed to clarify whether early reduction of BPV will improve the prognosis of these patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Blood Pressure/physiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/epidemiology , PrognosisABSTRACT
In a retrospective analysis, the authors investigated day-by-day blood pressure variability (BPV) and its association with clinical outcomes (critical vs. severe and discharged) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The study participants were hospitalized in Tongji Hospital, Guanggu Branch, Wuhan, China, between February 1 and April 1, 2020. BPV was assessed as standard derivation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and variability independent of mean (VIM). The 79 participants included 60 (75.9%) severe patients discharged from the hospital after up to 47 days of hospitalization, and 19 (24.1%) critically ill patients transferred to other hospitals for further treatment (n = 13), admitted to ICU (n = 3) or died (n=3). Despite similar use of antihypertensive medication (47.4% vs. 41.7%) and mean levels of systolic/diastolic blood pressure (131.3/75.2 vs. 125.4/77.3 mmHg), critically ill patients, compared with severe and discharged patients, had a significantly (p ≤ .04) greater variability of systolic (SD 14.92 vs. 10.84 mmHg, CV 11.39% vs. 8.56%, and VIM 15.15 vs. 10.75 units) and diastolic blood pressure (SD 9.38 vs. 7.50 mmHg, CV 12.66% vs. 9.80%, and VIM 9.33 vs. 7.50 units). After adjustment for confounding factors, the odds ratios for critical versus severe and discharged patients for systolic BPV were 3.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-9.66, p = .02), 4.09 (95% CI 1.14-14.67, p = .03), and 2.81 (95% CI 1.12-7.05, p = .03) for each 5-mmHg increment in SD, 5% increment in CV, and 5-unit increment in VIM, respectively. Similar trends were observed for diastolic BPV indices (p ≤ .08). In conclusion, in patients with COVID-19, BPV was greater and associated with worse clinical outcomes.